On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 03:19:36PM -0300, Fernando Trebien wrote: > Situation 1 happens in many other cities across the world, and if you > tag the bridge as layer=1, you may end up inverting the rendering > order of highways, leading to this: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138032009
what exactly is the problem here? Colour artefacts on the Quai des Gevres? If it is affected by the layer than it is a bug in Mapnik - and no, we should not use layer to fix bugs in Mapnik. Looking at the data in JOSM I see a few problems - for example there is no reason why this particular way should have any layer tag at all. It seems completely useless and one of the reasons I want to enforce the "no layer tag without a bridge/tunnel" rule which would catch similar accidents. While not wrong in this case it is also not needed to have the bridge at layer=2. Also building=bridge is the wrong tag for this bridge (tagging for Mapnik again ?) but if it is used at all the ways entering the bridge ought at least share a node with the bridge where they are entering it. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging