On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 08:14:42PM +0100, fly wrote: > Well, think it might get tricky. I know places where you will find > several springs right next to each other. Some are hot, some are warm > and some are cold. All have different contents not depending on the > temperature.
that is fine. The current proposal is one natural=hot_spring for each spring (we alread have natural=spring for those which are not hot). water characteristics can be tagged per spring and per pool. > Another point is the use of sports=swimming which is way to general > defined so far and should not be used for every places where you can go > swimming but for places with some infrastructure. current possibilities to map swimming are next to useless, that is on my list. For now sport=swimming is the only way to map anything ranging from toddler swimming, leisure swimming, skinny dipping, chunky dumping, ice swimming, competition swimming or the Ka'iwi Channel swim. > Well, please think about adding water=* and removing sports=swimming > from the part about lakes/ponds. not really sure what you mean with this. natural=water is clearly endorsed "If there is a significant pool of water around the hot spring, use natural=water" sport=swimming is not perfect but until there is something better its better than nothing - and if there ever is a better way to map swimming it should be easy enough to change. > All together, I am not really sure if it is smart to split springs by > temperature. not by temperature, which is very subjective as explained in the rationale. Where a spring is localy known as hot spring or thermal spring it should be mapped as such. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
