On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 01:29:06PM +0000, Dan S wrote: > 2014-03-03 12:53 GMT+00:00 nounours77 <kuessemondtaegl...@gmail.com>: > > > >> I have significantly changed > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Hot_Spring > >> with the intention to revive the proposal - thanks for any comments and > >> enhancments. > > > > > > Dear Richard, > > > > thanks for your initiative. I agree with your arguments why a specific tag > > "natural=hot_spring" is better than "natural=spring" and "temp=*". It is > > something different. > > > > Not sure about the word "consistence" which looks strange to me (but I'm > > not native). > > "consistence" is not standard English. You probably don't mean > "consistency" either. "content"?
seems I am am bit archaic with my English. Content, composition, characteristics. Not required to be a detailed chemical analysis, a practical description like mud, saltwater, freshwater, sulfuric water, mineral water. Possibly multivalued with a list of the main minerals where notable. Meanwhile I thought the same tag should be good to characterise the water quality of the oceans, the Dead sea, the Azov sea (if it still exists) and freshwater... would be a pitty not to have this. So perhaps "water_characteristics" ? Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
