>
> John, at this point, would you please you put all this into a summary, or
> a full proposal, so we can see the entire package?
>
Do you mean this?:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/All_you_can_eat
I think I should better document the serving_system values. I will do that
this week for sure.


2014-02-17 20:57 GMT-03:00 Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com>:

> > So now, what's the difference in /serving style/ between rodizio and dim
> sum?
>
> The former is a serving style while the latter is a cuisine. The latter
> might also appear in restaurants that employ a serving style of rodizio.
> Btw, this is the first time I've been exposed to that term either in print
> or in reality but coincidentally, I ate lunch at such a place the the other
> day here in Chiang Mai. We ate quite a bit of food there as they just
> continued to bring it to the table
>
> John, at this point, would you please you put all this into a summary, or
> a full proposal, so we can see the entire package?
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:57 AM, John Packer <john.pack...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Updated the proposal.
>>
>> Summary of changes:
>> 1. combined subtag :opening_hours with the main tag (inspired by the
>> tags lit and fee)
>> 2. removed value "only" from main tag
>> 3. added value "special" to main tag
>> 4. renamed subtag :type to serving_system (should I move this to a new
>> proposal?)
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-02-17 16:33 GMT-03:00 John Packer <john.pack...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>> So now, what's the difference in /serving style/ between rodizio and dim
>>>> sum?
>>>>
>>> I never went to a restaurant with *dim sum*, but reading about it on
>>> wikipedia, I would say the differences are:
>>> In a rodízio, the waiters go around offering food, and don't leave food
>>> on a table unless requested by the clients upon offering. Also, in rodízio,
>>> the food doesn't come in plates, so there is no system for counting the
>>> expenses(I haven't heard of a rodízio that's not all-you-can-eat).
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-02-17 15:52 GMT-03:00 Serge Wroclawski <emac...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:57 AM, John Packer <john.pack...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Actually, all_you_can_eat:type=* describes the *way* the food is
>>>>> served. If the value is buffet, then people go to the food to get it;
>>>>> if the value is rodízio, then waiters go around the restaurant
>>>>> offering samples of food to each table;
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think "type" is the wrong word, and I hate subtags, so why not simply
>>>>
>>>> serving={buffet|whatever...}
>>>>
>>>> So now, what's the difference in /serving style/ between rodizio and
>>>> dim sum?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> if the value is conveyor_belt, then people sit around a rotating
>>>>> table which carries the food(probably always used for sushi); and so on.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fine so far, but I cannot see a need for a separate
>>>>>> all_you_can_eat:opening_hours subtag when the normal opening_hours
>>>>>> tag would serve the purpose.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> It should only be used for special cases. For example, if a cafe has
>>>>> an all-you-can-eat happy hour every friday afternoon, then you might
>>>>> include all_you_can_eat:opening_hours=Fr 14:00-18:00.
>>>>>
>>>>> This all seems like too much microtagging..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Serge
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tagging mailing list
>>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dave Swarthout
> Homer, Alaska
> Chiang Mai, Thailand
> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to