And what about "dzwonnica parawanowa" ( https://www.google.com/search?q=dzwonnica+parawanowa&tbm=isch ). Would it be bell_cage or tower or sth. else?
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: > My thoughts exactly about those open structures that house bells; > man_made=bell_cage (along with building=yes perhaps) would seem the best fit > in those cases, especially seeing as that tag is already in use. As for > adding subtypes to the tower:type tag, that seems an overly complicated way > to go about it. I cannot imagine how long it would take renderers to catch > up with such a scheme. > > Moreover, isn't a campanile merely a type of bell_tower? Why would another > special tower:type=campanile be necessary? I would push for: > man_made=tower > tower:type=bell_tower > for all structures that are much taller than they are wide, i.e., towers, > that also contain bells, including steeples and campaniles. > > For cases where you have a structure more like a house that contains bells, > man_made=bell_cage > building=yes > > Respectfully, > > Dave > > > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:13 AM, Frank Little <frank...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >> >> Andreas Labres wrote: >>> >>> >>> For me those are rather synonym (but different regions/cultures obviously >>> build >>> them much different). >>> >>> In German the word "Glockenstapel" doesn't exist (at least in our >>> latitude, >>> 48°). The Nordic "Klockstapel" as well as the Italian "Campanile" >>> translate to >>> "Glockenturm" (which means bell tower) in German. >>> >>> As those are all towers, I'd prefer >>> >> > man_made=tower >>> >>> >>> for all of them. And then I'd detail >>> >>> tower:type=belfry for those Nordic belfries >> >> > tower:type=campanile for those stand-alone Italien Campaniles >> > tower:type=bell_tower for any "ordinary" bell tower >>> >>> >>> Or even more extreme >>> >>> man_made=tower >>> tower:type=bell_tower >>> >>> (as we probably agree those all are bell towers) and optionally >>> >> > tower:subtype=belfry >>> >>> tower:subtype=campanile >>> /al >> >> >> Confusingly, some of the pictures on the wikipedia page for 'Klockstapel' >> (Swedish) are not towers but open structures (and not very tall structures >> at that). Similarly 'Klokkestabel' (Danish). Are these towers at all? They >> look like the kind of thing which the bell_cage proposal was intended to >> cover (and which have been used for such free-standing, non-tower bells here >> in the Netherlands (Dutch: 'Klokkenstoel'). >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bell_cage >> I notice that the Dutch wikipedia page for Klokkenstoel links to a German >> wikipedia page for Glockenstuhl. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Tomasz Rojek tom...@gmail.com gg:3055226 skype:tom.roj _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
