I'm trying to account for driveability, cyclability, walkability, and wheelchair-ability. Grade values 6-8 here are those that the Australian community advocates: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Davo#Draft_4x4_road_proposal
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>wrote: > > 2014/1/3 Fernando Trebien <fernando.treb...@gmail.com> > >> I decided to extend my comparison between tracktype and surface, now >> including smoothness. I think we may need a new tag to integrate all >> surface quality classification systems (it can well be a simple >> numeric tag). See this: http://i.imgur.com/yEJ52eE.png >> > > > > > I don't think we need yet another generalized tag for driveability of a > street. The current surface values give you an idea how a road might change > in rain / wet weather or improve when frozen, 4wd is only part of what you > need to know, mostly it is the clearance below the car and the distance > between the wheels that determine whether you can pass an uneven road or > not (maybe 4wd is assuming more generally an offroad vehicle). > > tracktype is a scale from grade1 to grade5, if you want to add more values > they should go in between not after at the end (e.g. 1a, 1b, ...) > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > -- Fernando Trebien +55 (51) 9962-5409 "The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law) "The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
