On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Errington <erringt...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:26:55 Steve Bennett wrote:Yes please! I just added > some hiking trails and had a named spur[1] that I > wanted to record. I used place=locality, but it seems wrong for the same > reasons you give. I'd suggest that since we have natural=peak, and > natural=saddle we should have natural=spur. natural=ridge, if it's not > already used, should be for ridges. natural=ridge is widely used (~8000) for ridges: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=ridge There's also natural=arrete (273): http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=arete Remarkably, there is not a single use of natural=spur. Maybe people just tag them as ridges? Could use natural=ridge, ridge=spur to be more precise perhaps. > Perhaps we could also have > natural=feature for a general named 'thing' that is visible and well known. > > 174 examples already: http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=feature#overview Taginfo doesn't seem to show any other information on them - I'd like to see how else they're being used. Steve
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
