2013/12/11 Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Malcolm Herring > <malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com> wrote: > > > I would be interested to hear (constructive!) ideas. > > ... >
> Finally, the > "seamark" namespace has to be interpreted as the "openseamap porject" > domain. You work since years in parallel and with no intention to > consolidate with the existing data/practices. > +1 (to all of Pièrre's message), and this is refering apparently to ALL tags. Why use a duplicate tag "seamark:harbour" if there are "landuse=harbour" and "leisure=marina"? Every single tag get duplicated and prefixed with "seamark" --- regardless whether it is a seamark / sign or something else (as he wrote, basically you have created a Openseamap-namespace inside OSM by prefixing "seamark" to everything). A constructive suggestion is to try to consolidate your tags. Use the seamark-prefix ONLY for seamarks and use OSM tags for stuff that already has established tags. There might be some grey areas (e.g. a landmark might not be a landmark if viewed from sea), but these are rare edge cases (and we'll surely find a solution) while you have literally invented duplicate tags for everything from toilets to restaurants. And bridges. And military areas. And... Rather than inventing a new tag for every object in the S-100 catalogue you should look what of these is already covered with standard osm tags and modify your editor presets accordingly. cheers, Martin https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aseamark%3Atype%3Dbridge
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
