Hi all,
I'm the co-author of this proposal.
There are a difference about bicycle-forbidden and a compulsory cycleway.
At a "bicycle forbidden" section cycling is not allowed ever.
At a road with a compulsory cycleway, it is allowed to cycle on the road,
if the cycleway is not passable, reachable or some other exceptions.
Example:
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~peewee32/use_cycleway/Bicycle_use_cycleway.htm?map=cycleways&zoom=18&lat=51.10724&lon=7.38169&layers=B00000FFFFFFFTFFFFFFF
With bicycle=no the secondary is not reachable. With bicycle=use_cycleway
a router can give those roads a lower factor.
In Germany it is allowed to leave the cycleway for a leftturn, if you
choose the normal leftturn-lane (which cars use). Or in Austria training
with a racebike is allowed to don't look after compulsory cycleway. I.e.
for the last case the router can give you an option to allow
"bicycle=use_cycleway"-roads.
We can't wait until all router add this tag, because they would say: "we
pay heed to this tag, because is not common.
Cheers
Masi (MasiMaster)
Am 12.11.2013, 19:29 Uhr, schrieb Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com>:
Pee Wee
A couple of questions.
How does this improve mapping/routing over using bicycle=no?
How does your proposal distinguish the exceptions to the rule that you
gave as an example below?
Cheers
Dave F.
On 12/11/2013 18:16, Pee Wee wrote:
Legallythese 2 roads are not the same. For example.. in NL some 3
wheelbicycles with certain measurements are allowed to ride the second
type of road.In other countries there is also a legal difference. For
this reason we propose this new tag.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
