I have updated the page to indoor play, but I don't know how to actually change the title of the page?
Do I need to just delete that one and create a new proposal called Indoor play? Putting a note in the discussion that it has been migrated from the previous soft play proposal? Thanks, Dom On 23 October 2013 20:51, Dominic Hosler <dominichos...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree we should move away from the trademarked title 'soft_play'. Perhaps > if we keep the proposal and change the name of the tag to indoor_play, to > include other types as well, as per brad's suggestion. We should also > include sub tag qualifiers to specify if it's soft play and for what ages > it's designed. I think it would be most appropriate to use indoor play > considering its catch all nature and the fact that it is already used by a > couple of websites. > > I will update the proposal and fill in the definition area, I must have just > missed it. However, I won't update it till tomorrow because I only have my > phone until then. > > Thanks, > Dom > > > > Jonathan <bigfatfro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I agree, we need to choose a term that is more generic, maybe >> leisure=childrens_adventure or kids_play or kids_amusement. There can >> always be a sub tag defining soft_play? >> >> Especially considering that a lot of softplay areas are now included among >> other internal children's play features? Softplay is just one bit. >> >> Jonathan >> >> http://bigfatfrog67.me >> >> On 23/10/2013 17:47, Brad Neuhauser wrote: >> >> Instead of "soft play", what about "indoor play" (or indoor play >> area/centre)? >> >> 1) it seems to be used as a catch all sometimes, even in the UK (ie - >> http://www.timeout.com/london/events/indoor-play-centres-in-london or >> http://www.dayoutwiththekids.co.uk/things-to-do-family/Northampton/Indoor-Play-Areas) >> 2) it is broad enough to cover all of these sort of places, since some >> indoor play areas may only have some actual "soft play" equipment meant for >> younger kids/toddlers (or, if you are only meaning the actual areas that >> have the soft play equipment, then that might be different) >> 3) it might make more sense for those outside the UK who don't use the >> term "soft play" much >> >> Brad >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Dominic Hosler <dominichos...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Due to child protection, you are generally not allowed to take >>> pictures inside the soft-play centres. Also, any official pictures are >>> copyrighted. >>> >>> In the proposal, I linked to a few websites of some soft play centres, >>> where they have pictures, I hoped this would be fine. >>> >>> Soft play is as Jonathan said, padding not inflatables. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Dom >>> >>> On 23 October 2013 14:31, Jonathan Bennett <jonobenn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Would they qualify as soft play? >>> > >>> > >>> > No, that's a bouncy castle. Soft play is padding, not inflatables. >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Tagging mailing list >>> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >> >> ________________________________ >> >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
