I agree we should move away from the trademarked title 'soft_play'. Perhaps if
we keep the proposal and change the name of the tag to indoor_play, to include
other types as well, as per brad's suggestion. We should also include sub tag
qualifiers to specify if it's soft play and for what ages it's designed. I
think it would be most appropriate to use indoor play considering its catch all
nature and the fact that it is already used by a couple of websites.
I will update the proposal and fill in the definition area, I must have just
missed it. However, I won't update it till tomorrow because I only have my
phone until then.
Thanks,
Dom
Jonathan <bigfatfro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I agree, we need to choose a term that is more generic, maybe
>leisure=childrens_adventure or kids_play or kids_amusement. There can
>always be a sub tag defining soft_play?
>
>Especially considering that a lot of softplay areas are now included
>among other internal children's play features? Softplay is just one
>bit.
>
>Jonathan
>
>http://bigfatfrog67.me
>
>On 23/10/2013 17:47, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
>> Instead of "soft play", what about "indoor play" (or indoor play
>> area/centre)?
>>
>> 1) it seems to be used as a catch all sometimes, even in the UK (ie -
>
>> http://www.timeout.com/london/events/indoor-play-centres-in-london or
>
>>
>http://www.dayoutwiththekids.co.uk/things-to-do-family/Northampton/Indoor-Play-Areas)
>> 2) it is broad enough to cover all of these sort of places, since
>some
>> indoor play areas may only have some actual "soft play" equipment
>> meant for younger kids/toddlers (or, if you are only meaning the
>> actual areas that have the soft play equipment, then that might be
>> different)
>> 3) it might make more sense for those outside the UK who don't use
>the
>> term "soft play" much
>>
>> Brad
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Dominic Hosler
>> <dominichos...@gmail.com <mailto:dominichos...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Due to child protection, you are generally not allowed to take
>> pictures inside the soft-play centres. Also, any official
>pictures are
>> copyrighted.
>>
>> In the proposal, I linked to a few websites of some soft play
>centres,
>> where they have pictures, I hoped this would be fine.
>>
>> Soft play is as Jonathan said, padding not inflatables.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dom
>>
>> On 23 October 2013 14:31, Jonathan Bennett <jonobenn...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:jonobenn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > On 23/10/2013 14:26, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Would they qualify as soft play?
>> >
>> >
>> > No, that's a bouncy castle. Soft play is padding, not
>inflatables.
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Tagging mailing list
>> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
>> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
