Wow, Oxford's parks sound a fun place to be! Not! ;-)
On a more serious note, I would have thought tagging this one:
http://cycle.st/p17860 would be straight forward because no pedestrian
and no bicycle also means no pushing a bicycle. You gotta wonder who
can use he gate? :-)
But thanks Stephen for the heads up on such tough restrictions on bike
users in the UK, have never seen anything so extreme. But then I've not
been to Oxford for about 20 years!
Jonathan
http://bigfatfrog67.me
On 14/10/2013 13:23, Stephen Gower wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 11:53:04AM +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
and [Neither cycling nor pushing allowed] would be an area/route
explicitly signed as e.g. "no bicycles not even pushed" (Oxford
University Parks used to be like this until a couple of years ago).
Just for the record, this is still the case in Oxford University Parks, they
had a few months trial of allowing people to push bikes, and shortly after
the trial was over they put up the current, explicit signs:
http://cycle.st/p53524 http://cycle.st/p53525 (text reads "NO CYCLES WHETHER
RIDDEN OR NOT")
The same is also true of Christ Church Meadows: http://cycle.st/p17860
http://cycle.st/p17861
Given people seem to be saying bicycle=no doesn't correspond to this
situation I'd be grateful for a tag, likely to be supported by routing
software etc, that does.
s
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
