Am 30.09.2013 18:19, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > > 2013/9/30 Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk <mailto:p...@trigpoint.me.uk>> > > And canal tunnels, there is usually a towpath through the same > tunnel, but we have to map them as separate tunnels, then there are > double track railway tunnels.
> > IMHO this is the same as for bridges: we don't have a general standard > how to map a bridge or a tunnel, all we (there are exceptions, speaking > about the general consensus how "normal" mapping is done) currently do > is attaching an attribute to a road (or sth. else) stating that it is on > a bridge or in a tunnel, but we do not map the bridge or tunnel itself. > > The solution could be a bridge object or a tunnel object (could be > either geometry or a relation) which would represent the actual > structure, would get tags like name (name of the bridge / tunnel, not of > the road, i.e. goodbye bridge_name), and so on. In the case of geometry > this would be an area outlining the feature, in the case of relations I > think there is already a proposal, but not very much used. Sure, man_made=bridge/tunnel for the outline and bridge/tunnel relation which are often both needed. fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
