Am 30.09.2013 17:27, schrieb Philip Barnes: > On 30/09/2013 15:42 François Lacombe wrote: >> 2013/9/30 fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com >> >> >> OK, I get your point but you have to admit that most of the times we >> have to deal with the standard situation and not with multi-use tunnels. >> >> That's because multi-use tunnels are not so mapped in OSM. >> On the other hand, be sure we can encounter many cases of multi-use >> tunnels in the world. >> >> Security galleries, parallel of road or train tunnels are more and more >> used for power transit and telecommunication cables roll out for instance. >> >> Far more globally, hosting a feature inside another is the central question. >> Are we forced to use relations ?
> And canal tunnels, there is usually a towpath through the same tunnel, > but we have to map them as separate tunnels, then there are double track > railway tunnels. Wait a minute we are talking about culverts and not about general tunnels. These are not well mapped and lots of tunnel relations are missing but thats a different story. Not talking about tunnel systems either. The question asked was "how to tag a culvert in a tunnel" and better why can it make sense to use tunnel=yes plus culvert=yes. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
