On 10.07.2013 14:04, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
what about natural=boulder for a remarkable rock?
A boulder is a loose single rock fragment. That's what the tag natural=stone
is for.
I would also be fine with natural=rock like it is suggested by you.
Great. :-)
Completely agree that natural=rock for rock covered areas doesn't fit
well in the tagging scheme (it is not a topographical feature o
type/class of terrain but a physical description), better use
landcover or surface instead of the natural key for these.
I am not sure about this, because there's also natural=water, natural=sand etc.
But anyway... we came to the same conclusion that we better use another tag
for rock covered areas.
--
Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/
Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
