what about natural=boulder for a remarkable rock?
There are only a disappointing 18 occurrences, but maybe with some promotion...

I would also be fine with natural=rock like it is suggested by you.

Completely agree that natural=rock for rock covered areas doesn't fit
well in the tagging scheme (it is not a topographical feature o
type/class of terrain but a physical description), better use
landcover or surface instead of the natural key for these.

cheers,
Martin

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to