To me a bucket is a bucket. What happens *outside the toilet* is of no relevance to the toilet experience.
The use of chemicals is, however, relevant. Chemically sensitive people for example may avoid chemical toilets of any style. Does that have to be a tag of its own? toilets <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toilets>=yes *toilets:chemical*=[yes,no] toilets:vault <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:toilets:type> =[flush,vault,pit <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:pitlatrine> ,bucket,composting] toilets:positions=[urinal,seat,squat] toilets:wheelchair <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair> =[yes,limited,designated,no] drinking_water <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:drinking_water>=yes fee=no That said, I can't see rendering engines using more than two icons: "toilet" and some form of "outhouse". All our composting and chemical dreams aside, those are the two most important subdivisions. On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Brian Wolford <worldwidewolf...@gmail.com>wrote: > This is great. > One note on composing. Compost toilets can be both fixed location pits, > and buckets. I'm familiar with systems where buckets (5 to 40 gallons) are > filled with waste and then dumped on a local compost or picked up by a > third party and brought to a human waste composing center. > > I would say toilets:waste=flush,pitlatrine,bucket. And then add the > established composting=yes tag to tag as composting. This also covers flush > composters. > > I would also like to see chemical toilets brought back in somehow. They > are important WASH objects in camp mapping. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
