On 20/giu/2013, at 07:22, Bryce Nesbitt <bry...@obviously.com> wrote: > I see a an alternative of: > toilets:type=[flush,pit,chemical,bucket] > > Thus we might have: > > amenity=toilets > toilets:type=pit > drinking_water=yes > fee=no you can have pits with flush or without so this modification doesn't work. What are the benefits of the changes you propose? cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
