Hi! In my opinion this looks pretty nice. You still need to update the two examples Fukushima and Thémis - they are referring to relations and also to roles which are nowhere defined (perimeter was dropped, plant is not documented as role).
2013/4/8 François Lacombe <francois.laco...@telecom-bretagne.eu> > Hi, > > I finally agree with you. > I've began to update the proposal to remove relations in all cases except > when power plant doesn't have any physical permimeter. > > We must keep role=generator for all generators (no need to distinguish > them there) in such relation since other features may be added too. > This is where I still don't understand you: why do I need to specify that a feature XXX has the role XXX? Why do I need to specify, that a generator is a generator? A substation a substation? A dam a dam? A valve a valve? A weir a weir? And so on. > Concerning output/intermediate generators, I've introduced > generator:plant=output or generator:plant=intermediate to follow your > readability suggestion. > I'm not sure if this is the best key to describe it, but I also don't have a better one for you, so lets say: it's fine ;-) Finally I want to thank you for all your efforts on this topic! Best regards, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
