On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Peter Wendorff <wendo...@uni-paderborn.de> wrote:
> For data consumers supporting the new it follows: If there's no bridge-area > (e.g. man_made=bridge) defined, but there's a bridge=yes, I have to assume > an error, I might report that as such and/or I should fall back to assume a > bridge-area at/around the way, which is simple by creating a rectangle with > the assumed bridge width around the way. For me, it's clearly duplicates. Like keeping the "amenity=parking" node when you draw the parking polygon. Or keeping "abutters=residential" on the highway when you draw the "landuse=residential" polygon. Or it's just for backward compatibility, like keeping "natural=water" on "waterway=riverbank" until mapnik stylesheet rendered correctly riverbanks... Pieren _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
