A.Pirard.Papou wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies. I will add those POIs to OSM.
The feedback was to tag nodes rather than ways; I'm not sure why you
would add want to add "fake" nodes?
This post is asking taggers and OSMOSE, OSMI et al customers to check that
* the highlighted fake node's tags are correct and everything that's
needed for the genuine way's tag
* the nodes are, /*or what should be changed to be*/, visible in
OSM* et al but not obtrusive
* the instructions are understandable (style suggestions welcome)
Let's be sure to be definitive, once started to be removed, there will
be no comeback.
I have presently added one sample at 50.53035 5.71307
<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2024133661>.
That'll appear as a named node. Why do you need to add this fake node
to the OSM database rather than correctly tagging the ways that you (I
assume) have surveyed as being "maxspeed=30"?
You've set "source:maxspeed" to a forum link that probably won't be
there in a few month's time. What's the actual source and licence of
the data?
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
