2012/10/24 Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> > 2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo <[email protected]>: > > I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days > to > > enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I > think > > the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement > relation > > [1], but none of the listed types of enforcement is up to the task. > > > > I would therefore suggest adding a new type of enforcement: > > enforcement=access, possibly further detailed by an access=* tag (and all > > possible specifications, like foot=yes/no). The relation would have to > > include as members both the device node (more on this later), and the > way it > > guards the access to (which may also mean that no explicit access details > > need to be included in the relation, because they should already be > > specified on the guarded way). > > > > About the device: I haven't found a suitable tag for such a camera. > Should > > we think of a specific tag (like, highway=access_camera), or rather > should > > we try to come up with a more generic way of indicating an electronic > > detector? Perhaps, something like enforcement_device=*, with possible > values > > like speed_camera, access_camera... > > > I think it would be better to have just "camera" and get the what is > enforced from the "enforcement"-tag. A camera is a camera. >
I agree, but a speed "camera" is not actually a camera. I hoped it would be possible to differentiate between an actual video camera (whose capture is processed to detect plate numbers), an RFID detector, a radio Doppler measurement, a magnetic strip, and so on.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
