2012/10/24 Simone Saviolo <simone.savi...@gmail.com>: > I wish to map the cameras that my municipality is installing these days to > enforce the access restriction in the ZTL ( = limited traffic area). I think > the most appropriate structure to do this would be the enforcement relation > [1], but none of the listed types of enforcement is up to the task. > > I would therefore suggest adding a new type of enforcement: > enforcement=access, possibly further detailed by an access=* tag (and all > possible specifications, like foot=yes/no). The relation would have to > include as members both the device node (more on this later), and the way it > guards the access to (which may also mean that no explicit access details > need to be included in the relation, because they should already be > specified on the guarded way). > > About the device: I haven't found a suitable tag for such a camera. Should > we think of a specific tag (like, highway=access_camera), or rather should > we try to come up with a more generic way of indicating an electronic > detector? Perhaps, something like enforcement_device=*, with possible values > like speed_camera, access_camera...
I think it would be better to have just "camera" and get the what is enforced from the "enforcement"-tag. A camera is a camera. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
