2012/10/4 Martin Vonwald <imagic....@gmail.com>: > Hi again! > > I fixed that now (hopefully). What I spotted was a difference between > the relation Gooimeer [1] and Ijmeer [2]. The relation for Gooimeer > contains the tag natural=water while Ijmeer instead contains the tag > toponym=water. Any opinions on this?
looks as if "toponym" appears mostly in the Netherlands and was maybe introduced by the AND import: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/3dShapes/Landuse_import#toponym_toelichting wouldn't be bad to have some docu in English about the intended usage and meaning. For natural=water there are (conflicting) additional tags proposed: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_cover http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water which was approved last year here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details Unfortunately it was overseen that "water" was already in use by the time (guess, I didn't check when this mass of intermittent was entered). If you look at taginfo most actually used values are "intermittent", followed by "lake;pond" (the sheer quantity makes this look like an import or similar). cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
