-- Eckhart wrote -- Hi Rob,
Am Mittwoch, 19. September 2012, 18:08:30 schrieb Rob Nickerson: >* Despite some of the perceived benefits of this proposal being challenged*>* >(mainly in regards to their relevance),* Except for one claimed benefit, I did not question the relevance of the claims, but their validity. Maybe you should read mails before summarizing them? -- End -- Hi Eckhart, Please accept my apologies that my English was not clear. I did read your mails and my wording should be seen as it was intended - that is, the perceived benefits may not be "relevant" due to the "invalidity" of the thing they are trying to fix. I will try to be more exact next time. Kindest regards, Rob
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
