I propose that the radius would be from the centre of the mini-roundabout to the centreline of the road around it.
And to the previous poster who said that diameter would be better as it is hard to estimate the centre, I agree in general, but in this case we specify precisely where the centre is (it's the lat/lon of the node). I assert that centre + radius is the correct way to define this. Best wishes, Andrew On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:15 PM, Richard Welty <rwe...@averillpark.net> wrote: > On 6/6/12 10:03 AM, Philip Barnes wrote: > > There are lots that have 2m diameter, 1m radius, such as this pair in > Loggerheads http://goo.gl/NknP. > > Have seen some smaller but can't place any from memory. > > http://goo.gl/NknP – this URL has been disabled. > > i don't understand how a 2m or smaller diameter entity can qualify as a > "mini-roundabout" for > motorized vehicular traffic (at least, the 4 wheel kind.) > > or are we talking about 2 different diameters here? the outer diameter of > the circle vs the > diameter of the usually untraveled center? > > richard > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
