On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
>> With trunks and motorways, as with any other way unclassified and
>> larger, it's best to explicitly define restrictions rather than expect
>> them to be implicit.
>
> So, if horses are allowed in Texas motorways, we should add "horse=no"
> in German motorways ? Or if camels are allowed in Egyptians motorways,
> we shoudl add "camel=no" in Canadian motorways ?

Not necessarily that specific given the realms of possibility, but
yes, more detail is better.  A somewhat random example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/60957683

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to