On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >> With trunks and motorways, as with any other way unclassified and >> larger, it's best to explicitly define restrictions rather than expect >> them to be implicit. > > So, if horses are allowed in Texas motorways, we should add "horse=no" > in German motorways ? Or if camels are allowed in Egyptians motorways, > we shoudl add "camel=no" in Canadian motorways ?
Not necessarily that specific given the realms of possibility, but yes, more detail is better. A somewhat random example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/60957683 _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging