Jonathan Bennett wrote: > In summary: I believe the three classes to be separate and > non-overlapping. So I disagree with the wiki edit made, but do think > surface=sett is a sensible, verifiable tag.
A "sett" (a word I've never heard before) is apparently colloquially called "cobblestone". To the extent that even the image in the Wikipedia article about "sett" is called "Cobblestones_01.jpg".
We cannot just introduce a new surface value "sett": That would change the definition of surface=cobblestone to no longer include sett surfaces. But almost all surface=cobblestone currently in the database have actually a "sett" surface, and according to the wiki documentation until now, this was the expected way to tag them - it was using a sett surface as an illustration for the meaning of surface=cobblestone.
Tobias _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
