-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 06.12.2011 11:36, schrieb Jo: > > > 2011/12/6 Vincent Pottier <vpott...@gmail.com <mailto:vpott...@gmail.com>> > > Le 06/12/2011 10:43, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit : > > 2011/12/6 Jo<winfi...@gmail.com <mailto:winfi...@gmail.com>>: > > I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole > complex, this > can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site > relations, > AFAIK) > > I get complaints if I start using polygons that way... > > > what kind of complaints? From the editor? Which tags? > > > I created this fuel station: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1492951 > > and got a complaint from a fellow mapper. > > He didn't like this one either: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1491170 > > But maybe I put the tags in the wrong place. > > JOSM complains with a: > > Style for outer way mismatches > > Probably because it doesn't like buildings to be members of a multipolygon > relation.
A relation needs at least at type=* tag (in this case multipolygon) and the modern way is to put as many tags as possible in the relation instead of adding them to each member. Cheers Colliar -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAk7gv/sACgkQHJwlxKzMjpZDmQCcCVBDD+mU+mfLAn2b9I314r1Z ItAAnjD4OakWWEULJpQh0VPM0Ix3tJCU =HzgZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
