2011/12/5 Jo <winfi...@gmail.com>: > 2011/12/5 Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >> 7) Instead of "hotel:garden = yes" it might be more useful to >> actually draw the garden (leisure=garden, garden:style=, >> garden:type=hotel or similar)
> And then group them all together with a site relation? I'd use a polygon (amenity=hotel, etc.) for the whole complex, this can be easily evaluated, (what nobody does so far with site relations, AFAIK) >> > hotel:parking = yes;Ladeuze >> you should include the parking polygon/node in the hotel polygon, so >> this tag is not needed (IMHO) > This underground parking lot is 500m away though. you could use a multipolygon relation for the hotel (instead of the polygon) and have the parking with the role outer attached to this relation. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
