On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 8/27/2011 4:52 PM, Anthony wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 8/27/2011 4:11 PM, Anthony wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On 8/27/2011 9:12 AM, Anthony wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Under Florida law [FS 316.003(47)], a sidewalk is always adjacent to a >>>>>> roadway. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, but the sidewalk tag does not apply to unmaintained grassy areas. >>>> >>>> Personally I'm not aware of any unmaintained grassy areas which are >>>> adjacent to a roadway, so I'm not sure if the tag should apply to them >>>> or not. >>> >>> Sorry, mowed grassy areas that are not maintained for foot traffic. >> >> I'm not sure what that has to do with your question, but okay. > > It means that the sidewalk tag does not mean the same thing as Florida law.
What's the difference? An area which is not meant for foot traffic is not a sidewalk under Florida law. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
