On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Anthony <o...@inbox.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 8/24/2011 8:07 PM, Anthony wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II<nerou...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 8/24/2011 3:44 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Secondly, I'm not sure that the >>>>> way of the crossing would be a highway=footway. Isn't that supposed to >>>>> be a separate "carriageway"? >>>> >>>> How is this not a separate linear object? >>>> >>>> http://maps.google.com/maps?q=orlando&hl=en&ll=28.535671,-81.374757&spn=0.001046,0.002575&gl=us&t=k&z=20&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=28.535671,-81.374757&panoid=DE6JLCTtWf6zny20lLARPw&cbp=12,188.61,,0,8.06 >>> >>> A vehicle could travel between the two. >>> >> The two what? I'm talking about the object represented by >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/67386026 . > > And you're asking how it is not separate from what? > Couldn't a vehicle travel between the road and the crosswalk? Isn't that the distinction which you say means that the two ways should not be mapped separately?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
