Oh, Gawd! I think you are right. So my newest proposal :) would be:
checkpoint=hiking or cycling or whatever else and instead of hiking_course=value course=value? Zsolt On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2011/7/15 Zsolt Bertalan <herrber...@gmail.com>: > > No, I see it as a tourism feature. I don't want to introduce a new > > namespace. The other tag (hiking_checkpoint=yes) is only needed in the > rare > > case if we already have a tourism tag. > > > I agree to the others: don't propose 2 tags for the same thing. As you > say, stamping points (or hiking checkpoints) will usually / often be > related to touristic features. This is IMHO the reason why "tourism" > is not suitable as a key for them: they will already be represented by > a feature with a tourism key (e.g. attraction). > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
