On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 6:14 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > what about introducing a kerb:height ? Implying heights from values > like "yes", "raised", "normal" will probably not be very reliable or > stable as this might vary from country to country and also in > different cities/neighbourhoods.
That's not a bad idea. "kerb=yes" should have some general meaning, and if there is a more precise measurement available, store it in "kerb:height=...". Btw, I much prefer "kerb=yes" over "kerb=normal", because "*=yes" is very widespread in OSM tagging vocabulary. So: kerb=flush kerb=lowered kerb=rolled kerb=yes kerb=raised (ie, higher than normal, for a bus/tram stop...) Now, since people *will* use kerb=no, how should it be interpreted? I would say it would cover all of flush, lowered and rolled (ie, everything "better" than kerb=yes) Steve _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
