2011-06-22 Josh Doe: > I think we're definitely going for functional. The original author used > those height ranges, and I'm not sure if there's any value to mention > something specific like 16cm, so I changed it to ~0cm for flush, ~3cm > for lowered, and >3cm for raised. I've edited the proposal to that effect.
I agree with your decision to go for functional classification. However, I just noticed that it seems there isn't a value for "standard" kerbs? (One that is neither raised nor lowered?) -- Tobias Knerr _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
