On 6 May 2011 01:09, Andre Engels <andreeng...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:54 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Yes, they already do use it: >>> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/historic%3Aevent#values >> >> No, I meant more like historic=pa >> >> I have no idea what it means, but there is 2100 uses... >> >> http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/keys/historic#values >> >> So if I were to tag the same thing unknowingly, I wouldn't use that >> key pair to tag it... > > Unless you are in New Zealand, you're unlikely to tag the same thing: > It's being used for a Maori fortress, see > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P%C4%81_%28M%C4%81ori%29
That seems too specific, it should be a subset of historic=fort, and even then how many of these still actually have some kind of physical presence, which is the argument against tagging historically significant events. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
