On 6 May 2011 00:59, Pieren <pier...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 4:30 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> In fact the only thing that will be accomplished by removing >> references on the wiki is people will use multiple key/value pairs for >> the same type of object because they can't see any other values that are >> already documented. >> > > Between the two extremes, completely removing or putting the controversed > tag 'event' prominent in the Map Features (where the feedback shows that the > tag is far away from a consensus), I tried something new with this
So far one person has gamed the vote, hardly convincing, especially since they wish to do away with historic=battlefield as well, of which there is 317 tagged objects, and based on a quick glance a large variety of people using that tag in the 3-4 years of it being approved. > considered as a "map feature". This is a lot of efforts to find a compromise > to satisfy everyone. Already some think what can be mapped should be limited and enforced on the wiki, but it won't limit anything, it will just make a mess of things in terms of the same type of object being tagged in many different ways. > You will find anyway in the database much much more undocumented tags than > documented tags. So keep the Map Features page for what it has been created. So that is a reason to remove documented features that would be useful for others wanting to tag the same thing? Already someone else has used it as well. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
