Am 18.03.2011 14:01, schrieb Jo: > I also tagged a more complicated one: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481829/history > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481828/history > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481830/history > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481831/history > > I guess it can't be helped that sev > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging eral relations are needed? > > Jo
This correct, but I have to admit that I sometimes violate the rule to use only one way with role=street. Otherwise I would get around 50 relations for only one street. No editor does know how to handel the relation if you split the way with role street. I only use several associatedSteets in case of different postal_codes within the street. cu fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
