On 7 January 2011 07:03, Simone Saviolo <simone.savi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure, but it's a matter of defining a line between "chaos" and "coordinated > anarchy". It seems that many OSMers would not want to go any further than an > anarchy, this may be ok, but for the data to be somehow useful (and not only > a bunch of self-referential, self-glorifying material) coordination is > needed.
+1 If you wanted true anarchy people would use datums other than WGS84, it would also make the data pretty useless as a result. If we can all agree on a datum, why can't the same be true for tags as well? PS wikipedia claims WGS84 is only useful until 2010, anyone know what we should be using instead? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
