Hi Robert, On Mittwoch, 15. Dezember 2010, Robert Naylor wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:08:37 -0000, Serge Wroclawski wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Werner Hoch <werner...@gmx.de> > >> > >> Examples without unified tagging: > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1291579 > >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/396170 > > > > These are features of Bing, not of the earth. They belong with the > > Bing dataset, or else another dataset which collects metadata about > > imagery, but I don't think it belongs in OSM. > > Also see top of http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing/Coverage > > "Please use this page for recording coverage. Do not use boundary > relations. Large, detailed relations can be exceptionally slow to > retrieve and cause very high server load, especially when accessible > via an OpenLayers slippymap client. Significant problems have > already been caused by people trying to map coverage with a > relation, and then posting the relation URL."
Just a short note: With proper tags on the areas/ways you could generate the whole wiki page out of the osm data. Regards Werner _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
