On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Werner Hoch <werner...@gmx.de> wrote: > Hello, > > I've created a proposal for imagery objects and other objects that are > only used internaly in osm. > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/osm
> Aerial Imagery: > --------------------------- > With the new Bing images many new relations have been created that > contain boundaries of hires images. I think it would be cool to have a > uniq tagging for such objects. > Examples without unified tagging: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1291579 > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/396170 These are features of Bing, not of the earth. They belong with the Bing dataset, or else another dataset which collects metadata about imagery, but I don't think it belongs in OSM. > Worksets, Experimental Tagging, ... > --------------------------------------------- > Sometimes mappers are creating objects with experimental tagging or > collections of objects for personal use. They can do that on a dev server. > Mappers that do QA work sometimes delete or change that objects. They shouldn't be doing QA work on the production dataset. > These messages can only be read by human mappers, not by bots. To make > it easier for the QA mapper, the bots and the mappers that are working > on new things it would be nice to have a uniq tagging for such objects. > The proposed tags are: > osm=experimental; osm=test; osm=temporary; osm=workset > > Comments and additional ideas are welcome. We have a mechanism for people to experiment with; that's the dev server. If you're saying that's not sufficient, I'd like to hear why and what we can/should be providing to aid mappers's experimentation without effecting our production dataset. - Serge _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
