2010/11/16 John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>: > On 16 November 2010 10:33, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2010/11/16 John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>: >>> At the very least surface=* makes a lot more sense than landuse=grass etc... >> yes, but it doesn't make more sense then landcover=grass. >> surface=industrial doesn't make any sense either ;-) > Why are you trying to confuse landuse with surface covering?
Where am I doing this? This discussion gets silly. There are no new arguments. I know that there was the idea to use surface for landcover some time ago, but it doesn't work in all cases and it is not in widespread usage AFAIK, so this might be changed IMHO. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
