On 10/27/2010 10:24 AM, Anthony wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 10:27 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer > <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2010/10/27 Anthony <o...@inbox.org>: >> >>> One proposal for mapping stop signs is that the stop sign always faces >>> opposite the nearest intersection. >> >> so let's discuss about this. I don't think it is a good idea to have >> implicit facing, I would prefer to - at least in exceptional cases - >> be able to define manually which is the facing of the sign, or better: >> on which way at which point (intersection) there is a stopping >> obligation. > > Yeah, that's pretty much what I said above. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/compass > > I vote for highway=stop + compass=X on the way at the stop line plus > traffic_sign=stop + compass=X at the actual stop sign location.
Why not use relations for stop sign applications similar to how enforcement relations work? It really seems silly to use a tag that expects people to imprecisely describe direction relative to four cardinal directions, or use degrees or radians, when you can essentially draw a picture.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
