2010/10/17 Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com>: > On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >> I wonder if it's worth the trouble and effort to maintain US-HISTORIC >> routes, since their use is primarily recreational and are frequently >> inconsistent in their continued existence, and frequently their historic >> posted alignments. For example, OK-66 goes through Kellyville, though >> the old US-66 alignment now runs abandoned and without pavement through >> the property I'm on... > > Since Historic US 66 is (I believe) posted in every state, yes, it > should have relations. These relations shouldn't include abandoned > roads that aren't marked as part of the historic route, however.
could be even more interesting to map those, as they are much harder to spot, don't you think? Just map them in a way they're not confusable with what is still ojn the ground / andor signposted. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
