On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Peter Budny <pet...@gatech.edu> wrote: > For better or worse, that made me think of images like > http://failblog.org/2008/07/03/sign-design-fail/ > > Whether it's a good thing or not, we still have to figure out how to tag > it. Bear with us.
It's not as bad as it looks. It's a junction with three legs: *behind the camera: US 29 north, US 601 north *straight ahead: US 29 south, US 601 south (signs say US 601 By-Pass south, but this designation was removed in 1997! http://www.ncdot.gov/doh/preconstruct/traffic/safety/reports/RTE/US601B_19970724.pdf), NC 73 west *to the left: NC 73 east (former US 601 Business south until 1997) US 601 Truck does not seem to be an official designation, but merely a statement that trucks should use the bypass. NC 73 Truck does not pass through this intersection (there should be TO plates up top), but begins straight ahead where NC 73 splits from US 29-601 (then follows US 601 and NC 49, rejoining NC 73 near Mount Pleasant). The routes (except for NC 73 Truck) appear on http://dotw-xfer01.dot.state.nc.us/imgdot/DOTCountyMaps/PDFs/cabar_plt02SRMU-Tif800.pdf (near the top, somewhat west of center, just west of Beverly Hills Elementary). _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
