On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:43:36 +0200 Peter Körner <osm-li...@mazdermind.de> wrote:
> Am 13.10.2010 09:31, schrieb Matthias Meißer: > > For this proposal IMHO the users who removed the proposal should be > > notified and the author should be allowed to add his new feature to > > the map features page. He fullfilled all requirements with his > > proposal > > I contacted him and we're still in a very interesting discussion. His > opinion is, that the map-features should list the *most common used* > features and it's clear that with 500 uses, craft does not fall into > this category. So I can accept this tag not being listed on > map-features but findable via a the search. This is a definition > problem of what should be on the map-features page. > > Peter > If map features is restricted to "most common used" how will it ever enlarge to cover new tags which can't be advertised?? I don't agree with the logic expressed in Map features page oversize > do not add any more Liz _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
