On 9/23/10 7:27 AM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Hi Richard.
Never heard of that, so let me ask to clearify...
On 23.09.2010 00:59, Richard Welty wrote:
On 9/22/10 6:47 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
What happens if tags conflict then? For example just say the boundary
actually had a name, e.g. "X Y Border", but the river also has a
different name.
one of the operative theories here is that in cases of shared ways,
we should be using the higher level relations that contain the ways to
provide the distinction.
Following situation: There are two shops inside the same building and
the building is a node only, yet.
Let's assume the position of the shops cannot be distinguished -
examples can be found in discussions about e.g. post offices together
with stationery shops etc.
If I interpret your statement correct, you propose to tag that as
follows:
i'm not proposing anything about that particular situation, the original
discussion was about shared ways (e.g., admin boundary and river
bank, or admin boundary and highway.)
furthermore, i would consider representing a building with unknown
outline with a node to be a bit iffy.
so no, i'm not proposing anything about how to set up relations for
this
Nevertheless I think, it could be a very useful scheme to generally
support grouping tags together while differentiating several groups on
one geometry object.
using relations in this manner has potential, but the variations are far
from
completely worked out or agreed upon.
richard
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
