On 22 September 2010 21:19, Andrew Harvey <[email protected]> wrote: > My interpretation of the "One feature, one OSM-object" suggestion
I can only assume that was referring to physical objects, rather than meta information. Boundaries aren't a physical object, and they're not properly dealt with most of the time in any case. Waterways is one of the few things, especially where no hi-res imagery is available, I actually think they can be shared. Take for example the Murray RIver, the south bank is the border, it's also the south bank of the river, is there really much more in splitting them since when one moves they both do. I very very strongly disagree that a bot should be used to split this information, too many boundary relations already get broken by people, I shudder to imagine how badly a bot could really screw things up. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
