2010/8/30 Anthony <o...@inbox.org>: >> The definition you quoted said: "way or path". In the aerial images >> posted here there was neither of them. If was just grass. No way. > > I'm not sure which aerial you're referring, but I also don't see why a > strip of grass wouldn't qualify as a "way or path".
http://www.nearmap.com/?ll=-34.854348,138.535446&z=22&t=h&nmd=20100614 >> You can actually see informal footways/paths quite well in aerial >> imagery. If they are there and you have good resolution images. >> Usually the grass is only beneath then, because grass doesn't grow where >> people (or animals) walk (frequently). It disappears even if it was there >> before. > > Well, all the places where I'd tag a footway are places where people > walk. +1. People can walk on almost every grass covered area, but I wouldn't invent footways just because you can walk there, I would tag them where people actually do walk. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
