>>> To pick a random example: >>> http://osm.org/go/uG2Mh6iR >> >> Oops, sorry for spam, but nearby I spotted a convenient example of the >> alternative approach: one way that serves as both administrative >> boundary and river. > > Which was one of his points, what if the river isn't the boundary and > due to erosion moves but the boundary doesn't...
Correct, further, you're right Steve, that the rendering does start to look off because of criss-crossing, but I don't see a good alternative for mobile natural features, like rivers/streams. Maybe for more static natural features relations should be used. -Erik _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
